edwardtemple | 1 points
The new hydrochloroquine?https://theedtemple.blogspot.com/2021/04/effective-vaccine-alternatives.html
https://www.reddit.com/r/ivermectin/comments/mpkrqs/safety_tolerability_and_pharmacokinetics_of/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
[-] blindpew23 | 0 points
Thank God for this article. Many should read this...the World has been duped!
[-] stereomatch | 3 points | Apr 19 2021 11:22:07
Article makes some claims which are unfounded.
While Dr Fauci's slow response in approving medications for AIDS (almost a mirror of the current slowness to approve early treatments) is well documented.
And it is well documented that the Wuhan labs were not working in isolation - but in fact were collaborating on research with other countries including the US.
However taking that to mean that Dr Fauci or even a government would willingly launch a virus as a weapon on the world is difficult to believe. It could be possible, but does not seem like a logical or strategically sound choice - since even a new virus in the lab would be hard to characterize how it will behave when launched on the world.
It could be an inadvertent leak - which is always a risk. However I don't think one can blame whole governments or their people for that.
But by all accounts it does seem to be a natural source. There have been a number of analyses (not all can be bought by a government) - and most agree that a natural source ie from a biological reservoir - bats or whatever - could be possible.
Though there are others like the French HIV researcher who claim conspiracy, but I am not competent to judge what the merits of their arguments are.
Not removing this post - leaving it for educational purposes.
permalink
[-] verhegja | 2 points | Apr 19 2021 16:31:44
The evidence will never go away. If the virus is man made, it was made by gene splicing using CRISPR. As the virus replicates the spliced RNA gets replicated so it will be in every viral particle. The sequence of the splice is easy to identify given its unique code. It just takes a trained geneticist to match the slice to its origins. Natural genetic mutations are more random, whereas splices are clean systematic and obvious to the trained eye. Which is it? The truth will eventually come out.
permalink