ASIA PACIFIC TODAY. Covid-19 and the inhumanity of Government with Dr Pierre Kory. (Mar 31, 2021) - interview is from before WHO ruling on ivermectin

stereomatch | 8 points | Apr 02 2021 19:49:03

ASIA PACIFIC TODAY. Covid-19 and the inhumanity of Government with Dr Pierre Kory. (Mar 31, 2021) - interview is from before WHO ruling on ivermectin

https://rumble.com/vf81sv-asia-pacific-today.-covid-19-and-the-inhumanity-of-government..html

https://rumble.com/vf81sv-asia-pacific-today-covid-19-and-the-inhumanity-of-government.html

ASIA PACIFIC TODAY. Covid-19 and the inhumanity of Government with Dr Pierre Kory.

ASIA PACIFIC TODAY

March 31, 2021

The FLCCC Alliance recently led a global panel of medical and scientific experts calling on Governments to put an end to the COVID-19 pandemic, by "immediately adopting policies that allow for the use of ivermectin in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19". Their pleas have been ignored by the public health bureaucrats and Government Leaders. This dereliction of duty by the public health bureaucrats and Government leaders, will lead to the needless death and suffering of citizens not only in America but in countries that follow America’s lead. Is there another agenda being pursued by our Governments or is it simply filthy lucre?

at the 9:00 minute mark:

They discuss the (upcoming at that time) ruling from the WHO on ivermectin.

Dr Pierre Kory correctly points out that unlike other governmental agencies, the WHO had delegated a team (under Unitaid) for looking at repurposed drugs. All have been found to be not promising - until ivermectin.

Which Dr Andrew Hill and the WHO final report shows to be effective in reducing mortality. This is a level of detail other governmental agencies have not provided (FDA in fact said don't use ivermectin, but then in the same press release said that they haven't examined the data!).

Where the WHO has deviated has been in the policy directives they have issued as conclusion to their report on ivermectin.

That is, they have it seems included the reality that UK doesn't have stockpiles of ivermectin (acknowledged in Dr Andrew Hill's message here

So for the UK, a delay is a moot point ie doesn't matter much - but it does matter for places which do have supply of the drug):

https://www.reddit.com/r/ivermectin/comments/mhuwve/sad_joke_dr_andrew_hill_explains_how_there_were/ Sad joke, Dr. Andrew Hill explains how there were "at risk orders" for vaccines w/unknown results (but we see IVM needs divine provocation)

at the 11:20 minute mark:

It's one of the world's safest medicines.

It is low cost.

It's the most feasible for the world esp all of the low income countries that cannot afford or have access to these expensive vaccines.

It's a humanitarian solution that should be promoted and guided.

at the 13:20 minute mark:

(NOTE: talking about the FLCCC's paper finally being pushed in an upcoming issues of the Journal of Therapeutics - after the Frontier's Open Access head honcho stepped in to stop it's imminent publication after having passed peer review - a step that is often only taken for research found to be fraudulent)

In normal times, a peer reviewed publication which concludes that a medicine is a solution to a disease - in normal times that would become a major media event.

And people would report that around the world, and they would say you know what a solution has been found for x and y disease.

That's what I think the significance is.

Now when my paper gets published and I think it is 2 to 3 weeks away, I am very curious to see what we happen, because i will tell you that my experience in my advocacy in my trying to disseminate the results of our review - it's not just my review, it is a number of groups - Tess Lawrie - some of the most expert systematic reviewers and meta-analysis researchers around the world, which is Tess Lawrie and her group in the UK - their paper passed peer review and was not published.

And so I don't know what's going to happen when it's published. Is it going to be dismissed. In normal times it should be a major media event that should be disseminated around the world that ivermectin is a solution and that it should be adopted worldwide.

That is the conclusion of our paper, and that is supported by 4 expert peer reviewers. Two of them senior FDA scientists, and another one a very senior governmental scientist.

at the 15:30 minute mark:

(NOTE: they talk about YouTube's censorship of Dr Pierre Kory's testimony at the US Senate)

... the video has not been reinstated

(NOTE: I searched YouTube for - Pierre Kory Senate - and while the original video may not be there - the one with the large number of views that would have provided it prominence, there are some small YouTube channel videos that cover his testimony - for example this: https://youtu.be/1vWXMlWUm5k)

(NOTE: an example of Bloomberg mislabeling another video by a doctor pleading for early treatment options for patients - is titled "anti-vaccination doctor Jane Orient Testifies to Senate on Covid Treatment" - now it could be that she is anti-vaxxer, but her plea for early treatment should not be confused with anti-vaxxer syndrome - her testimony seems to be about the need for early treatment, and the smear campaign against HCQ - many comments for this video note this disconnect and see the wrong title as an effort to smear her message)

at the 18:15 minute mark:

... "censorship has never been shown to lead to a societal good" ...

... "literally you don't see in any mainstream media any positive reports of ivermectin, or negative reports on vaccines - it's like a lockdown" ...

(NOTE: actually there are occasional reports on specific vaccine issues, if not general ones)