What u/alsterg says is right. This was blatant CENSORSHIP. The authors are world class researchers. The article passed formal review process successfully. I have a copy of email between the FRONTIERS journal and the authors, showing that their paper was approved unconditionally on Jan. 13. NOW the journal is backpedaling and saying that the approval was not final and there were more reviews in the works. The email proves them wrong. And this SCIENTIST article is just part of the COVER-UP.
[-] newtonma2020 | 3 points | Mar 04 2021 15:52:02
What u/alsterg says is right. This was blatant CENSORSHIP. The authors are world class researchers. The article passed formal review process successfully. I have a copy of email between the FRONTIERS journal and the authors, showing that their paper was approved unconditionally on Jan. 13. NOW the journal is backpedaling and saying that the approval was not final and there were more reviews in the works. The email proves them wrong. And this SCIENTIST article is just part of the COVER-UP.
permalink