landude1 | 31 points
World Health Organization confirms that in 6 weeks there will be news about the use of Ivermectin in early treatment for Covid19. Media briefing, 15 Feb 2021[-] dogrescuersometimes | 12 points
6 weeks says be prepared for less than stellar news.
A truthful response would have happened already.
So very true, unless they had their heads up big pharmas ass so far they couldn't see the light. If it weren't for those doctors in Australia we may not be this far. If anyone follow Peak Prosperity's channel Dr Chris has been talking up Ivermectin since Last March or so. And lets face it Fouchi is nothing but a puppet with a hand up his ass. His words mean nothing. I place my fist order for Ivermectin in November and have been following the dosing info provided by the FLCCC. They are the truth right now and all us little guys.
Spread the truth and stop unnecessary deaths.
[-] bitregister | 4 points
The dominos are started to fall, a few weeks and this will gain some steam (finally), the data can't be ignored and buried forever.
So true, but with all the deaths someone or some organization needs to be held responsible,There can be too many theories like "notice how the vaccine came out right after the election". It needs to be torn down from the top down. Will that ever happen,doubtful. Unless us crazy fucks that are in this thread push when it comes time! Who's in?
[-] dogrescuersometimes | 3 points
Amen.
[-] dogrescuersometimes | 2 points
I wrote that before listening.
That was kind of hopeful sounding. Especially the second speaker.
[-] mmmm_frietjes | 9 points
6 weeks ¯\(ツ)/¯
[-] LimbRetrieval-Bot | 3 points
I have retrieved these for you _ _
^^ To prevent anymore lost limbs throughout Reddit, correctly escape the arms and shoulders by typing the shrug as ¯\\\_(ツ)_/¯ or ¯\\\_(ツ)\_/¯
They say 4 to 6 weeks. Past history makes me predict that whatever trial Dr. Hill is waiting for will be / is being sabotaged and that will mess up the timing. Dr. Hill spoke weeks ago about some studies he expected would come out soon, and it appears we’re still talking about the same studies. Even though we have more studies now than he did when he spoke. I hope I’m wrong. I don’t think he specified exactly how many studies are but I think he did specify the number of patients.
Sorry. I mean this is good news, relatively speaking; it’s just, I mean it was good news when Trump called off the putsch, but his (complete lack of) enthusiasm for doing so seems to match that of the speakers here.
[-] mekikichee | 18 points | Feb 16 2021 01:02:42
"6 weeks"
"The window of opportunity is still open"
Dragging their feet once again. Why?
permalink
[-] landude1 | 20 points | Feb 16 2021 01:10:10
Especially since the FLCCC already did all the work and gathered all the data.
permalink
[-] Haitchpeasauce | 10 points | Feb 16 2021 01:22:12
Andrew Hill has access to the researchers behind the studies in his meta analysis, and is also awaiting data from more trials. Dr Kory and Dr Hill are on the same page, as is Dr Tess Lawrie.
permalink
[-] landude1 | 8 points | Feb 16 2021 01:29:12
Don't you love it when it finally all starts to comes together. I've been waiting on this for a very long time. As I'm sure we all have.
permalink
[-] Haitchpeasauce | 10 points | Feb 16 2021 01:42:40
Long overdue. Way more signal than any other drug and still no reaction until the right people made a lot of noise. This has been a bottom up process, and it shows how much harder progress is compared to having a pharma company or political figure pushing things forward.
permalink
[-] MrElvey | 4 points | Feb 16 2021 04:42:54
Yeah sure they are! Such an absurd thing to say.
I mean unless they’re all being super diplomatic and are all mad as hell at the delay!
I mean what - somebody convinced Dr. Kory that suddenly that the evidence the FLCCC compiled is not mountainous? S. M. H.
permalink
[-] Haitchpeasauce | 13 points | Feb 16 2021 06:43:21
I don't know what you're trying to say.
Kory said the data was overwhelming, the signal so consistent, the forest plot unlike anything he's seen. He is mad as hell and doing everything he can to talk about the data. Taking the right steps to reach the top authorities takes time, I sense his frustration but also playing a careful game to make strides forward.
Dr Hill conducted his own meta analysis with access to more data, but Kory has stated many times he has been in touch with Dr Hill. We have to appreciate that their conclusions were reached independently, this makes the findings even more persuasive. Dr Hill is a consultant to the WHO, Kory doesn't have this access.
Kory's paper is extremely thorough and comprehensive, and will go down as hugely influential manuscript in medicine.
permalink