democrats_suk | 25 points | Jan 30 2021 16:16:15

Google doesn’t want us to hear about ivermectin

https://thefederalist.com/2021/01/28/youtube-nuked-two-videos-of-a-senate-hearing-on-covid-19-treatments/

permalink

[-] HeeeeeyNow | 7 points | Jan 30 2021 16:40:39

It’s a dark and evil force - look what they did to HCQ.. nuked into oblivion, amazing doctors banned from Twitter, and now articles coming out saying it’s actually effective.

They only want to promote the vaccine.

permalink

[-] steveissuperman | 1 points | Jan 30 2021 22:08:22

HCQ was pretty thoroughly looked into and found to not be effective. Doctors promoting it are crackpots. IVM hasn't been looked into nearly as much, and the data is hit and miss, but it is guilty by association unfortunately.

permalink

[-] HeeeeeyNow | 1 points | Feb 01 2021 12:20:21

The docs seem like crackpots because they know it works and are being gaslit.. there are plenty of recent articles with a reversal on HCQ.

permalink

[-] lurker_lurks | 5 points | Jan 30 2021 20:12:20

The original footage can be found on cspan too.

permalink

[-] finfun8 | 4 points | Jan 30 2021 17:49:30

Wow, you can still find Dr. Kory's amazing testimony here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=1740&v=k8RyV3VEDKI&feature=youtu.be His statements starts 29 minutes into the video.

It is probably only still up because of the video labeling everyone in it as an Anti-Vaccer:
LIVE: Anti-Vaccine Doctor Testifies at Senate Homeland Security Hearing on Covid-19 Treatments

Neither Dr. Kory nor any of the amazing front line FLCCC doctors from all over the world are anti-vaccine. They see Ivermectin as a cheap bridge until vaccines are available for all.

I did not listen to the whole video. Maybe someone later was against vaccines, but to take down the videos that were just Dr. Korey's testimony is infuriating.

He clearly states that all they want is for the NIH to look at the new evidence that they collected to revise their recommendation from August 2020 (min 36). The NIH recently did revise their stand to neutral, which is a step in the right direction, but not enough.

From their FAQ regarding vaccines:

Will ivermectin interfere with the vaccine and can I continue to take ivermectin once vaccinated?

Our understanding of the importance of ivermectin in the context of the new vaccines, is that ivermectin prophylaxis should be thought of as complementary bridge to vaccination until the vaccines are made available to all those in need. At this time, and after speaking with the vaccine experts, we do not believe that ivermectin prophylaxis interferes with the efficacy/immune response to the vaccine, however it must also be recognized that no definitive data exists to more specifically answer this question. However, given that maximal immunity from the vaccines is only achieved 2 weeks after the second dose of vaccine, it is reasonable to take bi-weekly ivermectin until this time point.

This is just sad :-(

P.S. Many videos of Dr. Korey including his Senate testimony are available on Vimeo. Guess I will frequent them more often.

permalink

[-] giddyrobin | 4 points | Jan 30 2021 22:08:48

I noticed this from the beginning. When the EVMS protocol came out, Google wasn't showing it in search, even though I knew it was climbing in popularity. On Duck Duck Go, I could find the EVMS protocol.

permalink

[-] ashbada | 1 points | Jan 31 2021 03:05:31

So messed up!!! We will probably start hearing about treatment once they’ve vaxxxxdd everyone

permalink