Let’s get some scientific consensus on Iverermectin (“IVM”). This is not a political issue and IVM has antiviral properties, that fact can be term determined with a high probability of certainty and very low risk for an FDA approved drug for use in humans for parasitic infections with safety and efficacy. We may actually need a citizen led group to bring practitioners, independent scientists to make an informed statement? With civility, understanding the clinical experience of people in the front lines with Covid-19, researchers who believe IVM is effective and critics. As a citizen I want to understand the critics and their specific experience, research and credentials with IVM and COVID-19. Given that it is already safe and effective for use in humans high burden of proof & moral/legal liability on opponents.

permalink

You forgot to put (Australia 2020-08-08) in the post title per the naming convention. Next time, please.

IMO this video doesn't warrant anyone's attention. Borody has never done any original ivermectin research. During one of his interviews he mentions having read 6 or 8 papers. That's it. In one interview he admits that he has never used his so-called "triple therapy" (the treatment protocol in his trial's ClinicalTrials entry has 5 components). Borody might have been relevant when his California trial's N was 300 but it was reduced to 30, making it irrelevant IMO.

permalink