mastcell | 12 points
Dr. Paul Marik Discusses His I-MASK Protocol (Ivermectin is the key.)[-] Impressive_Run8581 | 1 points
Good interview. Lot less distraction from Been this time. I liked that Marik didn't take FDA line on horse gel - it's a practical reasonable response in a f'ing pandemic giving a 9/11 death toll every few days. Worried about January - and hospital capacity. I disagree with his dog heartworm strategy - while IVM persists in adipose tissue, Marik should stick with WHAT WE KNOW (Argentina) and not speculate. The 1mg daily (5 x 0.2mg) is proven and fits the facts with IVM half-life in plasma and tissue. Like a broken record - people keep missing the zinc-copper issue - esp when suggesting 100mg daily of zinc continuously.
[-] Alexanderandjeff | 1 points
A virus is obviously different from a parasite. .No one yet has determined what amounts are most efficacious.. There seems to be a relationship where when more Ivermectin is taken as opposed to less there seems to be less blood clumping and thus the reason why even after one day in the early stages symptoms abate...Its the blood clumping that seems to damage the small capillaries and thus interferes with the exchange of oxygen and co2 in the alveoli in the lung.This is based on Dr. Scheim research...If your interested in what he's recently found do a Dr. HIbbert / Dr. Scheim search on you tube .
[-] Haitchpeasauce | 1 points
Dr Scheim's theory is an interesting idea and goes some way to explain the clotting, but it misses other findings such as infected dendritic cells and the cytokine levels found in the animal models. Most certainly clotting is an issue and anticoagulation therapy is important in treating COVID-19, but it's as though Dr Scheim has hung his hat on the hemagglutinin mechanism being the key player of the severe symptoms and mortality. I read his paper and watched the interview on Hibberd Health channel.
[-] Alexanderandjeff | 1 points
Not a doctor or researcher but from a purely common sense point of view , Dr.Scheim is on to something if he can show Ivermectin actually interferes with blood clumping. That Ivermectins strength doesnt simply just lie in interfering with the virus ability for replication or quelling the cytokine storm but this blood clumping is the basis of the damage. If true then a blood thinner might really be a key to stop the damage the virus causes with Ivermectin early on or when the infection is detected. He sort of just threw it out there as one of the possibilities that he believed that Ivermectin interfered with the blood to clump...got into the red blood cell and interfered with it .. As time passed on, if one managed to stay alive clots would form . I do believe he's made a pretty convincing argument about the clumping appears to be a major factor with why there is so much damage going on all around the body ...By pointing to Malaria as a great example with the parasite penetrating in the red blood cell which then causing similar clumping of the red blood cells definitely supported his argument. The image of blood cells leaking through the capillaries is also pretty interesting and supports his arguments. I would think if those blood cells have a viral invader stuck on to themselves ,and travel around the body unloading the virus to Ace 2 receptors all around it would cause a huge continues reaction as the bodies immune system detectes a very serious invasion..He doent allude to this about breathing difficulties. I would think blood cells leaking into alveoli when the capillaries are breached would cause it to fill up with a liquid of sorts ...My understanding is the liquid is hyaluronic acid which has a propensity for holding ,1000x of H20 in it, compared to its own molecular weight..That jelly sitting in the alveoli, turns hard and in that phase , makes it impossible to breath through since the liquid in the alveoli impedes the gas exchange..Antibiotics dont work usually unless its bacterial and not inflammatory. A ventilator wont work well because a liquid is the reason for getting the oxygen on and Co2 out..They are basically blowing the lung up like a balloon when attempting to help one breath... The inflammation must be subdued if the virus is still active somehow .. . .Not so sure about that part bur Corticosteroids seem to do the trick and that makes sense . .The virus could be hiding in the cells that immunno priviledged in clumps within those clumps .. If viruses live on surfaces for hours or days why couldn't they do that as clumps within the immuno privedged or proteced cells ,and as you pointed out, the dendritic cells or the testicular cells are great examples......How is it explained that complete viral particles are found in the stool in many long haulers, months later....Ivermectin must be taken weekly for weeks or even months to eradicate the virus entirely in my view .. Ivermectin gets into those immuno protected cells because they are extremely small..Clumping might continue if the virus hides or in a diminished-like cytokine storm ensues ,sort of like the body immune system is watching but at a price of continuous inflammation to the body while the body harbors it .
[-] Alexanderandjeff | 1 points
Also why wouldnt these following methods be used as a prophylactic and possible treatment...nebulized 3% of food grade Hydrogen peroxide to work to disable or inactivate the virus in the nasal and respiratory areas. or Clorine dioxide in a nebulized form as a future candidate...Clorine Dioxide Its being used in Ecuador and made lawful to use to inactivate this Corona Virus.Obviously one would want a physician to over see that...Also nebulized iodine....Again under a doctor knowledge about its use..These are ideas that few talk about .
[-] Haitchpeasauce | 2 points | Nov 25 2020 03:33:27
This is a must watch video.
permalink