I'm posting this as more evidence that Borody is a BSer. This trial has two arms, comparing HCQ + AZT to HCQ + AZT + lopinavir + ritonavir. No ivermectin.
If ivermectin is a 100% cure, as he states, then why is he looking at HCQ + AZT?
Is he even a decent scientist?
This trial was first posted on 2020-07-07.
The FDA looked at the developing data about HCQ and revoked its EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) on 2020-06-15. Was Borody (hard to believe) unaware of the FDA's action and the research that led to the revocation?
While I'm here, I don't have a link but in one of his more-recent TV commercials (I mean, TV interviews) Borody said "In the six published papers I read..." (or words very close to that). That is the some total of his so-called "ivermectin research" -- despite his saying in another TV interview that we did this study and we did this other study. Just BSing to sell his "triple therapy", IMO.
Hell, I think I've read more than 6 articles.
While I'm here, does Borody intend to patent his so-called "triple therapy" (that actually has 5 components)?
He said he wants to create a blisterpack = combo drug = patentable
His clinical trial registration doesn't include dosages. Why not? I've never seen a trial that doesn't specify dosages, except for his. He's also being cagey about the dosages in his campaign to get Australian GPs to use his "triple therapy". Instead of just publishing his magic formula, GPs have to email him to get the dosages. WHY? Trade secret? Would publishing the dosages would endanger his eventual patent?
BorodyMectin(tm) is coming, folks, probably in time for covid-24. $399/pill?
Edit: One more bit of skepticism
Borody's ivermectin trial has two arms:
Experimental: Ivermectin, Doxycycline, Zinc, Vitamin D3 and Vitamin C
Control: Placebo and Vitamin D3, Vitamin C, and Zinc
Does anyone else think that it's bad science that the so-called placebo arm has 3 of the components of the experimental arm? Wouldn't it be better if the placebo arm was just placebo? Vitamin D3, vitamin C and zinc are all thought to be helpful with covid-19, or at least it's thought that they might be. I think Borody's failure to have a true placebo arm reduces the value of the study. I think it suggests that he's bad at science.
[-] TrumpLyftAlles | 2 points | Sep 20 2020 05:48:59
I'm posting this as more evidence that Borody is a BSer. This trial has two arms, comparing HCQ + AZT to HCQ + AZT + lopinavir + ritonavir. No ivermectin.
If ivermectin is a 100% cure, as he states, then why is he looking at HCQ + AZT?
Is he even a decent scientist?
This trial was first posted on 2020-07-07.
The FDA looked at the developing data about HCQ and revoked its EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) on 2020-06-15. Was Borody (hard to believe) unaware of the FDA's action and the research that led to the revocation?
While I'm here, I don't have a link but in one of his more-recent TV commercials (I mean, TV interviews) Borody said "In the six published papers I read..." (or words very close to that). That is the some total of his so-called "ivermectin research" -- despite his saying in another TV interview that we did this study and we did this other study. Just BSing to sell his "triple therapy", IMO.
Hell, I think I've read more than 6 articles.
While I'm here, does Borody intend to patent his so-called "triple therapy" (that actually has 5 components)?
He said he wants to create a blisterpack = combo drug = patentable
His clinical trial registration doesn't include dosages. Why not? I've never seen a trial that doesn't specify dosages, except for his. He's also being cagey about the dosages in his campaign to get Australian GPs to use his "triple therapy". Instead of just publishing his magic formula, GPs have to email him to get the dosages. WHY? Trade secret? Would publishing the dosages would endanger his eventual patent?
Borody has 150 patents. He knows how patents work -- hence, the caginess?
BorodyMectin(tm) is coming, folks, probably in time for covid-24. $399/pill?
Edit: One more bit of skepticism
Borody's ivermectin trial has two arms:
Experimental: Ivermectin, Doxycycline, Zinc, Vitamin D3 and Vitamin C
Control: Placebo and Vitamin D3, Vitamin C, and Zinc
Does anyone else think that it's bad science that the so-called placebo arm has 3 of the components of the experimental arm? Wouldn't it be better if the placebo arm was just placebo? Vitamin D3, vitamin C and zinc are all thought to be helpful with covid-19, or at least it's thought that they might be. I think Borody's failure to have a true placebo arm reduces the value of the study. I think it suggests that he's bad at science.
What do you think?
permalink